Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on YouTube Follow us on Tumblr
Register


REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
  1. #1
    Heartless Nukara's Avatar
    Registered
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Russia.
    Age
    20
    Posts
    76
    Gender
    Playing
    Kingdom hearts Union Cross.

    Default Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    I liked 0.2 and in terms of the plot and in terms of gameplay and in terms of graphics.
    And recently I learned that most consider the game is not very much in terms of the plot. Arguing that she destroyed the Black Points and the ending of KH1. But after all, in the secret ending of "BBS Volume two" hints of 0.2 were given.
    Many even compare the game almost with DDD in terms of the plot. What surprised me most was that for me it always seemed that 0.2 plot was understandable and did not have such difficulties.
    Is the game really all bad in the plot plan, and I'm just a "hardcore fan" who has a bad taste and I'm ready to eat everything that Nomura gives us?
    If I'm not the only one who is also surprised that 0.2 has a lot of criticism, respond.
       

  2. #2
    The Oracle is light everlasting Chaser's Avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    22
    Posts
    20,462
    Gender
    Playing
    God of War, Yakuza 6, Detroit: Become Human, Dissidia Final Fantasy

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nukara View Post
    And recently I learned that most consider the game is not very much in terms of the plot.
    It unfortunately isn't. Aqua's story itself just gave us a glimpse into how she's going and what she was doing over the 10 years between BbS and KH1. The stuff that takes place after DDD is summed up as Yen Sid sending all three of the Destiny Trios out on their next journey.


    Arguing that she destroyed the Black Points and the ending of KH1. But after all, in the secret ending of "BBS Volume two" hints of 0.2 were given.
    I don't hold Blank Points to high regard as others so her knowing Sora and Riku were helping Mickey hasn't really affected how I read the scene of her learning that Sora saved the world twice.

    It clashing with the end of KH1 bugs me a little. Riku not seeing or hearing Aqua as he rushes to close the door confuses me as they were being pretty loud and also close to Riku. Also that they added in a reason for Mickey to lose his shirt, but his pants and shoes were different to how they were in Kingdom Hearts as well. And where did he get a shirt in CoM?

    Many even compare the game almost with DDD in terms of the plot. What surprised me most was that for me it always seemed that 0.2 plot was understandable and did not have such difficulties.
    I haven't heard or seen these criticisms. It makes no sense to me either, 0.2 is fairly straightforward in terms of its plot.

    Is the game really all bad in the plot plan, and I'm just a "hardcore fan" who has a bad taste and I'm ready to eat everything that Nomura gives us?
    A lot of people expect the latter when they read up on this series. I admit I am a bit guilty of it, but the criticisms that you brought up just surprise me as how are the plots of DDD and 0.2 even comparable. That itself makes no sense.

  3. #3
    Heartless Jochira's Avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Age
    23
    Posts
    67
    Gender
    Playing
    the game of neutrality

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    cuz the game length of 0.2 is equally as long as the other games

    jokes apart, 0.2's story isn't bad at all. majority that played 0.2 played it with the knowledge of it being a very short game and what did they expect from a short game? of cuz, Riku not even noticing Aqua was just weird (and the random fan service), but otherwise I actually enjoyed 0.2

    on the topic of DDD: am I seriously the only one that enjoyed the story of DDD the most? must be cuz i'm weak to time travelling stuffs and such

  4. #4
    ~~~ DarkGrey Heroine's Avatar
    Registered
    Jan 2015
    Location
    the space station
    Age
    21
    Posts
    1,188
    Gender
    Playing
    Yume Nikki

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    I wouldn't compare 0.2 to DDD, not even a bit. 0.2 seemed to me like a "keep it simple" plot, with our usual KH terms, light vs darkness, crumbling bonds and really rigid dialogue.
    Visually, it blew my mind and KH has never been so directly beautiful. It was indeed very short, but I took it as it was, and, since Aqua isn't my favourite character even though she's a strong chick, I'm not head-over-heels or how to say it about 0.2
    It's great we got what is closest to that legendary Volume Two BBS from the past. We gotta appreciate that

    Quote Originally Posted by Jochira View Post
    on the topic of DDD: am I seriously the only one that enjoyed the story of DDD the most? must be cuz i'm weak to time travelling stuffs and such
    not the only one definitely, DDD is my fav game for its story as well. It kept my interest high through the whole playthrough! I'll never forget that summer in which I played it.. man...

  5. #5
    Organization Member Veevee's Avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2017
    Location
    darkness within darkness
    Age
    25
    Posts
    495
    Gender
    Playing
    Nier, Rocket League, Tales of Hearts, Sonic Forces, Digimon CS 2, MHW

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    I love 0.2 for the gameplay, the music and the graphics, but I heavily dislike the story and the dialogue lines. There are quite a few things that are quite ... strange and don't feel natural, I will point some out:

    -> Aqua being able to talk to Terra "through the means of darkness" - wut?
    - Mickey telling Aqua how he got to the Realm of Darkness, by "waiting for a world to fall into darkness and then slip in" - I'm sure this is not how it was meant, but it sounds like Mickey waited besides a world that fell into darkness to have a chance to get to the RoD
    - how it ruins Blank Points
    - how they conveniently got teleported to the Kingdom Key D which is said to be the counterpart of the Kingdom Key. I get that. But why is it on Destiny Islands since the regular Kingdom Key is not really Sora's blade or anyhow tied to DI in a special way?
    - and last but not least: Up to this game, it was not known whether any of the characters knows that Aqua is in the RoD so no one could go looking for her. But after this game we know that Mickey knew and decided to ignore this fact for a very long time. And you can't come around with "it was too dangerous" - Riku and him got locked in the RoD after the events in KH1 and Aqua should've been around / you could've targeted her with her wayfinder, so they SHOULD'VE gone back to look for her when they already WERE there. It makes Mickey, who knew all this, look like an asshole (in combination with the "I slipped in"-thingy), especially when he never mentions TAV up to Coded.

    Despite that, 'twas a nice game, if unnecessary.

  6. #6
    Real Fake Gold Member DarkosOverlord's Avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Age
    23
    Posts
    2,018
    Gender
    Playing
    Trying to wrap my brain about hearing people saying Larxene was "so edgelord"

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nukara View Post
    If I'm not the only one who is also surprised that 0.2 has a lot of criticism, respond.
    Wait, so I can't respond? I will anyway, thug life.

    It depends on how much is "so bad". After giving it some thought 0.2 will probably never be one of my favourite chapters, more like something that bothers me because of how many missed opportunities it had.

    I'm not a huge Blank Points fan, but I get the disappointment for different reasons: I was actually really liking 0.2 when it was about Aqua facing her doubts and fear while advancing in ruined worlds. Just a Pancake made a fair point on how 0.2 improved Aqua's characterization by making it about her struggles with the Darkness and not losing hope, whereas in BbS she was this friendship robot obsessed with her friends but making close to zero effort to keep them as such.

    But back to 0.2. The game utterly loses me when it tries to become a retcon for KH1's ending, something I don't think anyone ever asked for nor it felt needed. Aqua fighting Heartless with Riku not noticing her two inches away could be hilarious in some settings, but this isn't an Hot Shots! movie.

    And here and there you'll find even more plot points just because. I'll talk later about Mickey's shirt and his delirious rambling about the Kingdom Key Darkside, but even the fact that he just always knew where Aqua was but didn't say anything was in bad taste.

    Then other things were kind of a disappointment, you'd see them in the trailers thinking they're a tease of what's to come and it turns out that wasd the entire event.
    Like, the Darkside army was so underwhelming. Imagine seeing the 1000 Heartless in a KH II promo only to play the real thing and you battle 10 Heartless before a cutscene happens. I'm sorry, I have very little simpathy for this kind of bait: if you don't commit to the bit, you might as well not show me anything at all.

    Pretty much this. I won't say the game is absolute trash and it does have parts I really liked, but I can't bring myself to claim its story is good and there are no gripes with it.
    It's the next child born from the utter chaos KH's recent narrative is.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nukara View Post
    Many even compare the game almost with DDD in terms of the plot. What surprised me most was that for me it always seemed that 0.2 plot was understandable and did not have such difficulties.
    Quote Originally Posted by Chaser View Post
    I haven't heard or seen these criticisms. It makes no sense to me either, 0.2 is fairly straightforward in terms of its plot.
    What they were referring to was probably things like "hey let's retcon Mickey losing his shirt because clearly this has been bothered people way more than, say, where is Terra or something", and adding more stuff to the lore instead of clearing some questions up.

    Like, y'all are saying that 0.2's plot was easy and straightforward, and for the most part it is, but Mickey's monologue about going to the dark version of the Islands because there was a dark version of the Kingdom Key because that's how it works apparently and Mickey knew all of that for some reason still isn't really all that clear to me.
    It's a part of the Worlds/Keyblade lore never seen before, it's still not that clear and adds yet another footnote on what could be important or maybe not about the Kingdom Key and Destiny's Islands, not enough to have concrete ideas but something to remember.

    I definitely see shades of DDD's confusing writing and exposition in this. Oh, and brief Terranort cameo just like YX at the end of every world in DDD: a Nort arrives, something something important name drop, and now he's gone.
    Last edited by DarkosOverlord; February 4, 2018 at 04:29 PM.

  7. #7
    Heartless Nukara's Avatar
    Registered
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Russia.
    Age
    20
    Posts
    76
    Gender
    Playing
    Kingdom hearts Union Cross.

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkosOverlord View Post
    Wait, so I can't respond? I will anyway, thug life.

    It depends on how much is "so bad". After giving it some thought 0.2 will probably never be one of my favourite chapters, more like something that bothers me because of how many missed opportunities it had.

    I'm not a huge Blank Points fan, but I get the disappointment for different reasons: I was actually really liking 0.2 when it was about Aqua facing her doubts and fear while advancing in ruined worlds. Just a Pancake made a fair point on how 0.2 improved Aqua's characterization by making it about her struggles with the Darkness and not losing hope, whereas in BbS she was this friendship robot obsessed with her friends but making close to zero effort to keep them as such.

    But back to 0.2. The game utterly loses me when it tries to become a retcon for KH1's ending, something I don't think anyone ever asked for nor it felt needed. Aqua fighting Heartless with Riku not noticing her two inches away could be hilarious in some settings, but this isn't an Hot Shots! movie.

    And here and there you'll find even more plot points just because. I'll talk later about Mickey's shirt and his delirious rambling about the Kingdom Key Darkside, but even the fact that he just always knew where Aqua was but didn't say anything was in bad taste.

    Then other things were kind of a disappointment, you'd see them in the trailers thinking they're a tease of what's to come and it turns out that wasd the entire event.
    Like, the Darkside army was so underwhelming. Imagine seeing the 1000 Heartless in a KH II promo only to play the real thing and you battle 10 Heartless before a cutscene happens. I'm sorry, I have very little simpathy for this kind of bait: if you don't commit to the bit, you might as well not show me anything at all.

    Pretty much this. I won't say the game is absolute trash and it does have parts I really liked, but I can't bring myself to claim its story is good and there are no gripes with it.
    It's the next child born from the utter chaos KH's recent narrative is.





    What they were referring to was probably things like "hey let's retcon Mickey losing his shirt because clearly this has been bothered people way more than, say, where is Terra or something", and adding more stuff to the lore instead of clearing some questions up.

    Like, y'all are saying that 0.2's plot was easy and straightforward, and for the most part it is, but Mickey's monologue about going to the dark version of the Islands because there was a dark version of the Kingdom Key because that's how it works apparently and Mickey knew all of that for some reason still isn't really all that clear to me.
    It's a part of the Worlds/Keyblade lore never seen before, it's still not that clear and adds yet another footnote on what could be important or maybe not about the Kingdom Key and Destiny's Islands, not enough to have concrete ideas but something to remember.

    I definitely see shades of DDD's confusing writing and exposition in this. Oh, and brief Terranort cameo just like YX at the end of every world in DDD: a Nort arrives, something something important name drop, and now he's gone.
    I never thought the story in DDD was too complicated?
    There are no difficulties in it, and I understood certain moments only from the second time, but I can not name the game that is absolutely impossible to challenge.

  8. #8
    Real Fake Gold Member DarkosOverlord's Avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Age
    23
    Posts
    2,018
    Gender
    Playing
    Trying to wrap my brain about hearing people saying Larxene was "so edgelord"

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nukara View Post
    I never thought the story in DDD was too complicated?
    There are no difficulties in it, and I understood certain moments only from the second time, but I can not name the game that is absolutely impossible to challenge.
    Oh, DDD's storytelling is a hot mess.
    Time travel is explained once at the beginning, then another time at the end in a long and uninterrupted Young Xehanort monologue where things go a hundred miles a second. "You need to leave the body behind in order to time travel. Got that? Good, because I'm already talking about how Ansem did it. I'm not going to mention he was able to because he's a Heartless, figure that out yourself. And while you're at it, keep listening, for I'm explaining that he met me, passed onto me the power to time travel, now you got me and him to keep track since we're both doing important stuff. How did I time travel without losing my body, or did I actually lost that? Not relevant right now. Hey look, Xigbar's back. Or maybe it's Braig, who knows."

    The whole Dream shebang is not even fully explained. The worlds failed to awaken from their slumber and are trapped in a loop. Then why are Destiny's Islands also in the Realm of Light and one can go there no problem? Does being a Sleeping world doesn't affect that? ...then WHAT does it affect? Unlocking them saves them from what, exactly? *cue Captain Hook* "And why those seven?" Who or what decides which world becomes Sleeping and which doesn't?
    And let's not forget my all time favourite: The Grid is not a dream. It's a real world. Which means... heck if I know. Something.
    Oh, and Riku visited Sleeping worlds while being in Sora's dream, and that still counted. Then again, why wouldn't it? I don't understand the first thing of this dream concept!
    That's an awful lot of unanswered questions for what is supposed to be the game's main theme.

    And then we have meaningful and self-explanatory phrases such as "Darkness within Darkness awaits you". Sounds cool, but what does it means? What am I supposed to get from it on a concrete level? What are the additional dangers a Darkness within Darkness holds over mere Darkness?
    But let's focus on more positive things: Master Xehanort possessed Young and within him used No Name but with a different keyholder. And this actually makes sense: Young cannot use a Keyblade since he hasn't undergone proper training yet, so Master Xehanort had to do the honors. Which means he broke Mickey's Stopza like a boss, and then Riku battled technically Master Xehanort.

    I'm not gonna lie, that's pure badassery. Man, I wish I was able to get all of that from playing the game, and not from reading it in an interview.
    Oh, and Riku and Sora still have dream world clothes and powers at TWTNW. Well, that's because that world is weird. Makes sense I guess. And Dream Eaters are also still around, so... where the hiffle is everyone now? Is Mickey in the Dream World, or are Sora, Riku and the time travelling Norts in the Realm of Light and in the present?

    Secret bonus post-credits nitpick: Lea, Pete and Maleficent are Darkness wielding beings who appeared at Disney Castle through dark portals. Because screw the Cornerstone of Light and what it represented in KH II.


    Look. This still isn't rocket science. It's still plenty understandable... well, for the most part. Heck, if you got all of it during the first view, more power to you. Sincere congratulations. And we can still cook up some possible explanations for the unanswered mysteries, these forums are littered with them.
    I'm afraid however that doesn't change how badly DDD decided to tackle all of this, delving into complex explanations but glossing over pretty important "details", throwing a bunch of new stuff in the canon at us with no other choice but to accept them without questions.
    The X-Blade is now made of 20 parts, please engrave this in your mind or we can't proceed. Forget all you experienced in Ventus' story in BbS.
    Honestly, KH III could conjure out of thin air ANOTHER method to forge the X-Blade without explaining why, and I will just take it. I already did it once.

    One person's ability to understand even the most complicated matters doesn't mean there isn't a bad and a good way to show and narrate stuff.
    And to further clarify, that doesn't mean you can't ENJOY this or that, or that I'm passing judgement to whoever enjoys DDD: I don't hate DDD myself, and I wasn't foaming at my mouth in rage while writing all of this. In fact, it's one of the KH titles I play the most. You don't need to hate something to point out its flaws, and vice versa.
    If you feel depreciated or that this is too negative of a post I apologize, that wasn't the intention.
    I was just poking a bit of fun at certain moments and how they've been realized.
    Last edited by DarkosOverlord; February 4, 2018 at 07:22 PM.

  9. #9
    Heartless Nukara's Avatar
    Registered
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Russia.
    Age
    20
    Posts
    76
    Gender
    Playing
    Kingdom hearts Union Cross.

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkosOverlord View Post
    Oh, DDD's storytelling is a hot mess.
    Time travel is explained once at the beginning, then another time at the end in a long and uninterrupted Young Xehanort monologue where things go a hundred miles a second. "You need to leave the body behind in order to time travel. Got that? Good, because I'm already talking about how Ansem did it. I'm not going to mention he was able to because he's a Heartless, figure that out yourself. And while you're at it, keep listening, for I'm explaining that he met me, passed onto me the power to time travel, now you got me and him to keep track since we're both doing important stuff. How did I time travel without losing my body, or did I actually lost that? Not relevant right now. Hey look, Xigbar's back. Or maybe it's Braig, who knows."

    The whole Dream shebang is not even fully explained. The worlds failed to awaken from their slumber and are trapped in a loop. Then why are Destiny's Islands also in the Realm of Light and one can go there no problem? Does being a Sleeping world doesn't affect that? ...then WHAT does it affect? Unlocking them saves them from what, exactly? *cue Captain Hook* "And why those seven?" Who or what decides which world becomes Sleeping and which doesn't?
    And let's not forget my all time favourite: The Grid is not a dream. It's a real world. Which means... heck if I know. Something.
    Oh, and Riku visited Sleeping worlds while being in Sora's dream, and that still counted. Then again, why wouldn't it? I don't understand the first thing of this dream concept!
    That's an awful lot of unanswered questions for what is supposed to be the game's main theme.

    And then we have meaningful and self-explanatory phrases such as "Darkness within Darkness awaits you". Sounds cool, but what does it means? What am I supposed to get from it on a concrete level? What are the additional dangers a Darkness within Darkness holds over mere Darkness?
    But let's focus on more positive things: Master Xehanort possessed Young and within him used No Name but with a different keyholder. And this actually makes sense: Young cannot use a Keyblade since he hasn't undergone proper training yet, so Master Xehanort had to do the honors. Which means he broke Mickey's Stopza like a boss, and then Riku battled technically Master Xehanort.

    I'm not gonna lie, that's pure badassery. Man, I wish I was able to get all of that from playing the game, and not from reading it in an interview.
    Oh, and Riku and Sora still have dream world clothes and powers at TWTNW. Well, that's because that world is weird. Makes sense I guess. And Dream Eaters are also still around, so... where the hiffle is everyone now? Is Mickey in the Dream World, or are Sora, Riku and the time travelling Norts in the Realm of Light and in the present?

    Secret bonus post-credits nitpick: Lea, Pete and Maleficent are Darkness wielding beings who appeared at Disney Castle through dark portals. Because screw the Cornerstone of Light and what it represented in KH II.


    Look. This still isn't rocket science. It's still plenty understandable... well, for the most part. Heck, if you got all of it during the first view, more power to you. Sincere congratulations. And we can still cook up some possible explanations for the unanswered mysteries, these forums are littered with them.
    I'm afraid however that doesn't change how badly DDD decided to tackle all of this, delving into complex explanations but glossing over pretty important "details", throwing a bunch of new stuff in the canon at us with no other choice but to accept them without questions.
    The X-Blade is now made of 20 parts, please engrave this in your mind or we can't proceed. Forget all you experienced in Ventus' story in BbS.
    Honestly, KH III could conjure out of thin air ANOTHER method to forge the X-Blade without explaining why, and I will just take it. I already did it once.

    One person's ability to understand even the most complicated matters doesn't mean there isn't a bad and a good way to show and narrate stuff.
    And to further clarify, that doesn't mean you can't ENJOY this or that, or that I'm passing judgement to whoever enjoys DDD: I don't hate DDD myself, and I wasn't foaming at my mouth in rage while writing all of this. In fact, it's one of the KH titles I play the most. You don't need to hate something to point out its flaws, and vice versa.
    If you feel depreciated or that this is too negative of a post I apologize, that wasn't the intention.
    I was just poking a bit of fun at certain moments and how they've been realized.
    Perhaps I will agree with you that in DDD could and better explain some things related to travel in time.
    I'm OK with the complexities in KH, but in DDD, there are a lot of incompleteness.
    So in this regard, I agree with you. ;)

  10. #10
    Real Fake Gold Member DarkosOverlord's Avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Age
    23
    Posts
    2,018
    Gender
    Playing
    Trying to wrap my brain about hearing people saying Larxene was "so edgelord"

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nukara View Post
    Perhaps I will agree with you that in DDD could and better explain some things related to travel in time.
    I'm OK with the complexities in KH, but in DDD, there are a lot of incompleteness.
    So in this regard, I agree with you. ;)
    Hey you do you, if you still like DDD and don't see all the problems I had with it I am no one to take that from you.
    I know wall of text answers can sometimes be annoying so feel free to just dismiss me by singing the party pooper song ;)

  11. #11
    KH ☼ D&D ☼ Music ☼ Wack. GronoTRIGGERED's Avatar
    Registered
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Somewhere, surely procrastinating
    Age
    20
    Posts
    1,728
    Gender
    Playing
    Dungeons & Dragons, Pokémon, Tuba

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    I love the gameplay of 0.2 - in fact, I did a thread describing what I love about it about a year ago.

    As for the story... eh, Nomura said he had trouble writing the dialogue for the first half of the game, and that really shows.

    Blank Points sets up that Aqua is beaten down, worn to the thread, and tired of the Realm of Darkness. It's not the idea of this entire thing happening necessarily that destroys our perceptions of Blank Points, but that the information that was so powerful when first revealed in blank points now becomes useless and redundant. Why did she ask about how the outside world has been going? SHE ALREADY ASKED MICKEY THAT AND HAD A FOLLOW-UP ON IT. Why did she think that Ven and Terra could have been out there saving the world when she clearly must have known that Riku and Sora were the active keyblade wielders at that point? Better yet, but how could she have FORGOTTEN about those two?! The only thing she learns from Blank Points after it was retconned is that Sora is more important than he could have ever realized and that the worlds almost fell a second time, but even then this isn't impactful anymore since we just went through this with her in 0.2.

    It just makes me angry that one of the best secret endings the series has ever had was retconned for a short III demo and not even redone for the end of that game or anything! I mean, why leave all of this important information in here if she just looks like an idiot asking obvious questions now?!

    Sorry, the ending of that game does have me pretty heated.

  12. #12
    Keyblade Master redcrown's Avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    739
    Gender

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    I don't like BBS.2 solely because it's not a full game about the "period of absences" like it promised it would be back in 2010. This game was this series' last shot at exploring just a little more of the secondary character's stories that we didn't get to see much of during KH1-KH2, before releasing KH3, because now it's guaranteed we're never going to see it.

    Plot wise I didn't actually play this game myself but I've heard the synopsis; and like with the other plots and add-ons I feel undermine contradict or needlessly bloat pre-established stories and mythos in this series, I throw into my mental non-canon bin/straight up ignore it so I can still nourish my enjoyment and basic understanding of the series.

    It did look pretty snazzy though. And the ending with the other characters was nice to see too.

  13. #13
    KH ☼ D&D ☼ Music ☼ Wack. GronoTRIGGERED's Avatar
    Registered
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Somewhere, surely procrastinating
    Age
    20
    Posts
    1,728
    Gender
    Playing
    Dungeons & Dragons, Pokémon, Tuba

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by redcrown View Post
    I don't like BBS.2 solely because it's not a full game about the "period of absences" like it promised it would be back in 2010. This game was this series' last shot at exploring just a little more of the secondary character's stories that we didn't get to see much of during KH1-KH2, before releasing KH3, because now it's guaranteed we're never going to see it.

    Plot wise I didn't actually play this game myself but I've heard the synopsis; and like with the other plots and add-ons I feel undermine contradict or needlessly bloat pre-established stories and mythos in this series, I throw into my mental non-canon bin/straight up ignore it so I can still nourish my enjoyment and basic understanding of the series.

    It did look pretty snazzy though. And the ending with the other characters was nice to see too.
    Yeah, the game was pretty bloated retrospectively. A lot of it was unfortunately filler, as Nomura said he had trouble scripting many scenes where Aqua would be alone, and the only "mysteries" that were solved by it were the questions of how one enters the realm of darkness, where the Kingdom Key D came from, and why Mickey wouldn't have retrieved Aqua at the end of KH.

    Then again, that question could have been swept away with a simple "he just didn't bump into her, since the realm of darkness is one enormous world", and due to the fact that he didn't even mention her until 2.8 so it could have been assumed that he didn't even know where she was. And it opens up the question as to where Mickey went while Riku was searching Castle Oblivion... maybe he was just getting some clothes? Ugh, never mind, this game didn't answer any questions.

  14. #14
    Real Fake Gold Member DarkosOverlord's Avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Age
    23
    Posts
    2,018
    Gender
    Playing
    Trying to wrap my brain about hearing people saying Larxene was "so edgelord"

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by redcrown View Post
    I don't like BBS.2 solely because it's not a full game about the "period of absences" like it promised it would be back in 2010. This game was this series' last shot at exploring just a little more of the secondary character's stories that we didn't get to see much of during KH1-KH2, before releasing KH3, because now it's guaranteed we're never going to see it.

    Plot wise I didn't actually play this game myself but I've heard the synopsis; and like with the other plots and add-ons I feel undermine contradict or needlessly bloat pre-established stories and mythos in this series, I throw into my mental non-canon bin/straight up ignore it so I can still nourish my enjoyment and basic understanding of the series.

    It did look pretty snazzy though. And the ending with the other characters was nice to see too.
    Spot on.
    I was a stark defender of 0.2 before it came out, hoping it was going to get some story and lore off KH III's back since I was and still am kinda worried about how are they going to handle all of that. Instead, it turned into... what I already said earlier.

  15. #15

    Registered
    Jun 2015
    Age
    23
    Posts
    5,440

    Default Re: Is BBS 0.2 so bad?

    0.2's main story issue is that it doesn't offer much story at all. The game tries to make Aqua a more believable character and give her character more depth, but - in my eyes - fails miserably. Okay, well, she's not as bad as in BBS, but that's pretty hard to match anyway.
    I'm not against games that mostly develop characters. Reverse/Rebirth did the exact same thing - but in the exact opposite way. We see Riku understand his flaws and mistakes, his desperate fight to prove himself worthy of returning to the people he loves, and trying to set things right. He grows. He changes.
    We do see Aqua struggle with her own issues for a change, too, instead of just being the mom to run after Terra and Ven. That's cool, she needs that. However the execution is not good at all. It doesn't develop her character (and when it does, like the Phantom Aqua fight, it's ruined again immediately afterwards by her going full "lol I just beat my inner demon and found my reason to fight. Oh, illusions of Terra and Ven, my F R I E N D S, remember how they were all I was relevant for in BBS? Yeah, watch them be my plothole now" and deciding that she doesn't care if she's chasing them in vain after all. It renders the whole part about her fighting "herself" and her doubts right before that entirely useless).
    She doesn't grow, she doesn't change, all she finds is her reason to fight, and that's mostly when she finds Mickey and realizes there is probably some way for her to get out eventually. It has nothing to do with her overcoming her issues or questioning her own previous choices and trying to do better.

    And then there's the ending of the game, from the moment on that Mickey joins. It all feels so forced - be it the shirt scene, or the fact that Riku is diddlying oblivious to Aqua's presence - that it simply didn't leave any impact on me. It wasn't believable, so why would I care?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •