| | #1 |
| Warrior of Light | I've played all Squaresoft's games. Some are so hard to play because the graphics back then make me want to shiver now. I haven't played much of Enix's games in fact, the dragon Warrior saga is a mystery to me. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Iron Tomato | So, if you've played all SquareSoft games, you've played the games that they made when they were known as SunSoft? Yes, it was called SunSoft at one point, way back when they were a crappy company that was about to go bankrupt. Before they did, they made one final game, it was a new thing for this company, it was their final fantasy to make it as a gaming company. Once they released that game (Final Fantasy 1 dur) they made so much money they saved themselves from bankruptcy, and changed their names to SquareSoft. So, no offense, I doubt that you could have played them all of their games. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Organization Member | Quote:
As for the original topic, I doubt very many (if any) people have managed to play every Square and Enix game created, especially someone under the age of 20-25. Both companies have been around since the 80's, and neither has released all of their games in the US, though Square has certainly released more than Enix. Hence, you would need to import a lot of games and have the proper equipment to play them, unless we're to move into the forbidden area of "ROMs and Emulators." In which case it's somewhat possible, though still unlikely -- a lot of their games aren't "good" and/or aren't really known outside of Japan, and therefore have little to no fan base, making the likelihood of finding a ROM rather low. That being said, I've personally played around 15 to 20 Square and Enix games, with two of the oldest being King's Knight and Dragon Warrior, both for the NES. By the end of next year, that number will have risen a considerable amount with releases such as Kingdom Hearts II, Radiata Stories and Dragon Warrior/Quest VIII. | |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Iron Tomato | Quote:
Anyway, I've probably played about 15 Square games, and maybe only 2 or 3 Enix games. I can't remember hearing about Enix before the merge, so I don't remember any of their games. And I've yet to play a Dragon Quest (Warrior) game unfortunately. | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Organization Member | Quote:
With a little more looking, it does seem that Sunsoft and Squaresoft had some interaction at one point, though. According to RPGamer.com Sunsoft was responsible for re-releasing Squaresoft's early GameBoy titles back in the late 90's. Namely the Final Fantasy Legends and Final Fantasy Adventure games. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Iron Tomato | Okay, I guess that means that my magazine is wrong. I think I'll write them a letter. Thanks for clearing this up for me. Even if Square Co. Ltd. was created by ex-Sunsoft employees, we wouldn't count those as games made by Square-Enix. But what about games that were developed by Square, but produced by another company. I think (keyword being think) that Breath of Fire, the first one,was developed by SquareSoft, but produced by Capcom. I'm not sure about that though, but do those games count as well? |
| | |
| | #7 |
| DaDides Join Date: Mar 2005 Age: 19
Posts: 2,189
Rep Power: 6 ![]() | uh...u guys are crazy!!lol playing all the game square has created... i have FFX and FFX2 KH and another game i forgot...but thats it |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Organization Member | Quote:
That aside, Capcom actually did create the original Breath of Fire. Squaresoft was just given the job of localizing the game, which it has done several times -- another game they localized, according to Wikipedia, was Wild Arms 3 (PS2). Perhaps because of their success with the Final Fantasy series; I couldn't tell you for sure one way or another. Square Enix has apparently had interaction with a lot of other companies (including Nintendo and Electronic Arts), so tracking down every game the company has worked on -- even if it was something like localizing it -- would be quite challenging. I think sticking to this list from GameSpot would probably be the best idea. A lot of the games on that list are repeated and/or were never released outside of Japan, though. | |
| | |
| | #9 | ||
| Iron Tomato | Quote:
Quote:
So for now, we'll rule out games that SE had little to do with (ie just localizing) and we'll stick with games that they produced and developed. How does that sound? | ||
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Warrior of Light | Quote:
A lot of their games are horrible...HORRIBLE...They spend a lot of time on games that are good like the Final Fantasy series or Kingdom Hearts. When Square doesn't spend GREAT detail into designing the game, the end result of the game always has EXTREME flaws. Star Ocean Till the End of time: Horrible voice acting, long and repetitive, boring plot The Bouncer: Erk...the name gave me chills and the game itself was..."WTF?!" Unlimited Saga: ....................It's Unlimited Saga...the game that got a 4 out of 10 on gamespot. IT'S BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDDDD.... Square's games are only good when they really try hard on making the game. Otherwise, their games seem so bad it seems like someone was drunk when designing it. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Keyblade Wielder | I haven't played all of them but I think it would be fun. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| ~~~~~ | lol well i played alot of Enix games ( every final fantasy ) ![]() |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Iron Tomato | Quote:
And, yes, if they don't put all their effort into a game, it is pretty bad. Well, not bad, but flawed in many, many ways. | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Organization Member | While that's true, it's also the case with every game developer out there. Quality is based on time spent, hence little time typically means low quality -- or at the very least, a lot of recycled graphics, areas and the like. Something along the lines of FFX and FFX-2, in other words. As for "bad" Square/Enix games, I agree that Unlimited Saga is near-unplayable, but I completely disagree with the comments made towards The Bouncer and Star Ocean 3. Both were decent games for their release period, and although both obviously had some flaws (SO3's Director's Cut took care of a lot before it came to the US), I found them enjoyable anyway. The beginning segments of SO3 are admittedly boring, but once it picks up, it's a very nice game in my opinion. It has a nice amount of replay value as well, which is something you don't find very often in today's RPGs -- as is a difficulty setting. The Bouncer's only real problem was that it was more of a movie than a fighting game. But since it's release, we've seen games like Xenosaga that have just as much (if not more) scene time as play time, so in reality, The Bouncer has probably become more "acceptable" as time passed. The story itself was rather basic, but still enjoyable enough if you ask me. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| peace sells | that is not possible as you need to be like a billionare in japan to buy all the shit and in america you need to buy even more shit there are some games that americans got that the japanese didn't get and vice-versa so that is impossible |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |