The Shroud of Jesus

[Phoenix]

That's a myth, T. Thousands of members are waiting to correct such mistakes. Do you not read magazines?

[Chaos-Shadow]

Originally Posted by Master T

I'm saying that there are better resources, because any a-hole can come and change pages in Wikipedia if they wanted to. Say, that reminds me of a story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4695376.stm

Anyway, this isn't the place to discuss this.

Offtopic: Computers traced to Capitol Hill removed unpalatable facts from articles on senators, while other entries were "vandalised", the site said. xD pretty funny, our government is corrupt xD

Ontopic, Well that shroud could have been his, but like others have posted it could have been anyones.

[.:Game Master:.]

We'll never know.

[Noblethe3rd]

We'll never know.

Never say never. There is no way of knowing that we won't figure out how it makes so don't claim that we will or won't figure out the truth behind it. Also for future reference it would be best that it be called the Shroud of Turin because calling it the Shroud of Jesus is making a baised statement about it from the start.

[New2Ya]

Originally Posted by Phoenix

Da Vinci certainly had the materials and ability to do it (more on wiki). Meh, he doesn't strike me as the type who would do that, but who knows.

Da Vinci did like to provoke the Church... so who knows...:rolleyes: