Evolution VS Creation

[HadesDragon]

An old favorite. Which one do you believe in (and what variant) and why?

=P I'd post what I think, but I want to see what others have to say. This should be fun.

EDIT: It just occured to me that this is somewhat similar to the other thread I created about Creationism in schools. Sorry staff, if you feel it's necessary, close this thread.

[Darkly Aesthetic]

*sigh* this again?

These threads never get anywhere ._.

Most of the people here besides a few christians believe in evolution.

What'd there to argue? No one ever takes the other's argument seriusly..

[HadesDragon]

Originally Posted by Darkly Aesthetic

*sigh* this again?

These threads never get anywhere ._.

You could say the same about this section in general, really.

Most of the people here besides a few christians believe in evolution.

What'd there to argue? No one is ever right <_<

We can debate points of view, though. And these threads are always fun. It's not like I'm begging you to post here anyway. If you don't feel it's worth yours or anyone else's time, move along.

And anyway, your statement about the majority believing in evolution, while correct, perhaps, doesn't take into account the forum is always changing. We have new members joining practically every day, and we have people leaving as well. I want to see if anyone had anything new to say.

[Forever Atlas]

lol this again? yeah. These are just that, arguments, you cant expect anything more from KHI.... even when you dont want to argue, people will keep saying to.... yada yada... and as was said before, most of the people on here dont believe in God or a god, or creation. Its mostly evolution. So yeah this debate will be more of an attack from each side than a discussion.

[Phoenix]

Fine, no playing around. Why do ostriches and emus have wings

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comd...ndflippers.jpg

Why do we find dolphins with hindlimbs?

Why do animals that thrive on darkness have eyes buried under the skin?

We find dolphins developing legs on an embryo, but the shark doesn't develop these structures. Why?


29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: the Scientific Case for Common Descent

Though I dislike posting sites, this really has everything you'd need.

[HadesDragon]

Again, Smooth, if you feel it's a waste of time, then don't post here. Move along and do something you consider productive. Your post is pretty much spam, you're not contributing anything to the discussion. Also, rarely does anyone "attack" each other here, and if they do, they're punished.

[Forever Atlas]

with neither side being willing to reason (for some reason the thought of reasoning on things is considered to be foolish) this will continue with no end and neither side agreeing on anything. >.> pointless. In the end, tensions will rise and everyone will still hold on to their beliefs....

Originally Posted by HadesDragon

Again, Smooth, if you feel it's a waste of time, then don't post here. Move along and do something you consider productive. Also, rarely does anyone "attack" each other here, and if they do, they're punished.

I did try a structured approach to the discussion where mass chaos and disrespect for each side wasnt allowed, but that failed... >.>

http://forums.khinsider.com/religiou...e-sign-up.html

[Darkly Aesthetic]

Originally Posted by HadesDragon

You could say the same about this section in general, really.



We can debate points of view, though. And these threads are always fun. It's not like I'm begging you to post here anyway. If you don't feel it's worth yours or anyone else's time, move along.

Well i'm posting my opinion on the subject.

:D

I think that the whole "Creationism vs. Evolution" subject is one of the biggest wastes of time (IRL too).
No one considers what the other side says, they're so convinced they're right it's useless to try and prove them wrong. It's no fun at all.

just my 2 cents.

peace.

[HadesDragon]

Originally Posted by Forever Atlas

with neither side being willing to reason (for some reason the thought of reasoning on things is considered to be foolish) this will continue with no end and neither side agreeing on anything. >.> pointless. In the end, tensions will rise and everyone will still hold on to their beliefs....

Speak for yourself. I, at least, fully consider I might be wrong and such when debating on such matters. I'd love to be wrong, personally. It's just a lot of the time arguments from creationists, are, forgive me, rather unconvicing.

Originally Posted by Darkly Aesthetic

Well i'm posting my opinion on the subject.

:D

I think that the whole "Creationism vs. Evolution" subject is one of the biggest wastes of time (IRL too).
No one considers what the other side says, they're so convinced they're right it's useless to try and prove them wrong. It's no fun at all.

just my 2 cents.

peace.

I see. And you believe in which? Or don't know?

[Darkly Aesthetic]

Originally Posted by HadesDragon

I see. And you believe in which? Or don't know?

Personally, i believe in evolution.

:D

yah.

[HadesDragon]

Originally Posted by Phoenix

Fine, no playing around. Why do ostriches and emus have wings

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comd...ndflippers.jpg

Why do we find dolphins with hindlimbs?

Why do animals that thrive on darkness have eyes buried under the skin?

We find dolphins developing legs on an embryo, but the shark doesn't develop these structures. Why?


29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: the Scientific Case for Common Descent

Though I dislike posting sites, this really has everything you'd need.

There's also that legged whale. =D

[Forever Atlas]

Originally Posted by HadesDragon

Speak for yourself. I, at least, fully consider I might be wrong and such when debating on such matters. I'd love to be wrong, personally. It's just a lot of the time arguments from creationists, are, forgive me, rather unconvicing.

Well maybe you are just one of the few and thats good. However, if you look through the other threads, its more of an attempt to prove the other side completely wrong without being willing to actually think about the other sides point. Its more a "okay you pointed this out, now let me find something to completely demolish your idea" not "okay you pointed this out, let me look more into it to see where you are coming from"

But who knows maybe this thread will work... or maybe it'll be the same as the previous dozen.

Ask me? I believe there are certain types of evolution, yes, but as for life as we know it to exist, I believe in creation

[HadesDragon]

Originally Posted by Forever Atlas

Well maybe you are just one of the few and thats good. However, if you look through the other threads, its more of an attempt to prove the other side completely wrong without being willing to actually think about the other sides point. Its more a "okay you pointed this out, now let me find something to completely demolish your idea" not "okay you pointed this out, let me look more into it to see where you are coming from"

But who knows maybe this thread will work... or maybe it'll be the same as the previous dozen.

Maybe you can contribute and help this thread NOT be like that then.

Ask me? I believe there are certain types of evolution, yes, but as for life as we know it to exist, I believe in creation

Elaborate. Types of evolution? What kinds?

[Phoenix]

Everybody knows dandelions, right? Well, did you know they reproduce without fertilization?

Why, then, do they have flowers and produce pollen?

[HadesDragon]

So uh, gaiez, I found this: National Geographic is wrong and so was Darwin

lulz. I'm in the process of reading it right now, and already see inaccuracies. I feel intelligent. =D