Of that, admittedly, I'm not entirely certain.
did i ever say it was "impossible"?
So then you also concede to the possibility that it's merely a printing-mistake, and nothing to get all crazy about? Super.
i really wish people didnt do that assumption i agree to it, but to a point where it's speculation and could be possible.
i'm not saying that it has to be true. or that it must be true. i only made it to fill the gap incase it was true.
Well, if it's your theory, one would naturally-assume you already agree with it...
it's firmly established in the "what if" category.
it's possible, but am i 100% agreeing on this? no, i will agree only if it ends up being officially confirmed. in this article it only seems to be a normal confirmation
you joined alittle over last year.
Correct. And, by that flawed-logic, you're even 'newer' than I am.
still, it's not rediculous if it's hypothetical. audo went on in the long debate as to why it's not likely for it to happen. but again, you clearly over react and take it to the next level. so tone it down a bit
Theories are fine. However, for something which is already so firmly-established? Quite ridiculous.
you joined alittle over last year. still, it's not rediculous if it's hypothetical. audo went on in the long debate as to why it's not likely for it to happen. but again, you clearly over react and take it to the next level. so tone it down a bit
Um, I'm not 'new', kthx.
Also, my response was completely warranted, considering your ridiculous comment.
lief, i know your new and all, but you need to calm down.
the argument wasnt wther it was possible (clearly it is) but if it's probable.again it was hypothetical theory if it wasnt a typo, but no one seem to get that.