The REAL explanation of global warming

[Sir Meta Knight]

Hey, maybe both of you can look up, see "Intelligent Discussion", and start linking to data to prove your points, or you're simply spewing rhetoric

just a little suggestion :>

[violent_anger]

I don't disregard the majority, I disagree with it. I can still do that, right?

[Raticus]

Originally Posted by Sir Meta Knight

Hey, maybe both of you can look up, see "Intelligent Discussion", and start linking to data to prove your points, or you're simply spewing rhetoric

just a little suggestion :>

Then how about you contribute something more intelligent than patronizing a conversation you obviously don't understand. Just a little suggestion.

Originally Posted by violent_anger

I don't disregard the majority, I disagree with it. I can still do that, right?

You can certainly do that, but if it's admittedly for the sake of perpetuating an argument, then I can't help you from my disdain.

[violent_anger]

Oh dear me, then. I admit nothing that I don't say, and I sure as hell didn't say that.

[Raticus]

Well, if you'd have it where you'd hold everything to an unrealistic level of subjectivity, then I'll let you have it.

[Sir Meta Knight]

Originally Posted by Raticus

Then how about you contribute something more intelligent than patronizing a conversation you obviously don't understand. Just a little suggestion.

I never actually showed that I didn't understand the argument, though. I just don't have enough facts in front of me to make an unbiased decision on the issue. Excuse me if I thought Intel was intelligent. Although great job with proving how stupid you are, making blanket assumptions just because I'm asking for data to back your positions up.

[Samber]

Here is my 5 cents worth. I myself agree with the majority because there is scientific evidence and whatnot that highly support that theory of global warming. That's just what i think. I'm not saying that they could be wrong, the majority has been wrong before. There was a time the majority thought the world was flat, turns out they were wrong weren't they?

Anyways, i just myself belive the majority, at least in this case, is correct. Though you do bring up some interesting points V_A.


~Sam

[Gav]

Originally Posted by Samber

Here is my 5 cents worth.

Isn't the idiomatic expression; "my two cents"?

Originally Posted by Samber

I myself agree with the majority because there is scientific evidence and whatnot that highly support that theory of global warming. That's just what i think.

Join the club.

Originally Posted by Samber

I'm not saying that they could be wrong, the majority has been wrong before. There was a time the majority thought the world was flat, turns out they were wrong weren't they?

Because back then they had the knowledge we know now, not to mention funding, resources etc.?

Originally Posted by Samber

Anyways, i just myself belive the majority, at least in this case, is correct. Though you do bring up some interesting points V_A.


~Sam

Correct on a social standard, the media feeds it to us.

[Raticus]

Originally Posted by Sir Meta Knight

I never actually showed that I didn't understand the argument, though. I just don't have enough facts in front of me to make an unbiased decision on the issue. Excuse me if I thought Intel was intelligent. Although great job with proving how stupid you are, making blanket assumptions just because I'm asking for data to back your positions up.

Those blanket assumptions came from your holier-than-thou "reasoning" to tell us that we don't belong in an intelligent discussion because we were having an argument. And your blanket assumption of calling me stupid doesn't really prove you any intelligence; if you want to interject to make yourself seem so, then I'd suggest going somewhere other than Intel. This isn't necessarily an argument of hard facts, as this thread has already touched on and established those, but how we can interpret these facts.

[Sir Meta Knight]

Originally Posted by Raticus

Those blanket assumptions came from your holier-than-thou "reasoning" to tell us that we don't belong in an intelligent discussion because we were having an argument. And your blanket assumption of calling me stupid doesn't really prove you any intelligence; if you want to interject to make yourself seem so, then I'd suggest going somewhere other than Intel. This isn't necessarily an argument of hard facts, as this thread has already touched on and established those, but how we can interpret these facts.

It's nice how you keep assuming I have attitudes over the Internet.

And I get it now. I thought you were trying to start that part of the topic over again, without stating data. I didn't get you were just trying to have an argument about the basis of disputing those facts.

Also, what page did anyone post information about this? I'm just wondering, I'd like to take a look at it.

[Raticus]

Originally Posted by Sir Meta Knight

It's nice how you keep assuming I have attitudes over the Internet.

Originally Posted by Sir Meta Knight

Hey, maybe both of you can look up, see "Intelligent Discussion", and start linking to data to prove your points, or you're simply spewing rhetoric

just a little suggestion :>

Yeah, 'cause you totally can't tell.

Originally Posted by Sir Meta Knight

And I get it now. I thought you were trying to start that part of the topic over again, without stating data. I didn't get you were just trying to have an argument about the basis of disputing those facts.

Also, what page did anyone post information about this? I'm just wondering, I'd like to take a look at it.

Originally Posted by Raticus

This isn't necessarily an argument of hard facts, as this thread has already touched on and established those, but how we can interpret these facts.

[Sir Meta Knight]

Originally Posted by Raticus

Yeah, 'cause you totally can't tell.

i know right :<

[violent_anger]

I can pee a distance of 5 feet, how about you guys?

[Raticus]

A majority of us have concluded that you can. :3

[Square Ninja]

Remember when this thread was about Global Warming?