| | #16 |
| Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Detroit and the rest is none of your got damn bussiness! Posts: 115
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Level: EXP: | oh what happened if the organization cameback? |
![]() | |
| | #17 | |
| ⎳ΣGΣNDΛRΨ | Quote:
She wasn't made into an Organization member when she was first 'born', when she was at her most 'loyal'. Why would she get it later? | |
![]() | |
| | #18 | ||||
| Araliya, Crimson & Gildragon's Xion Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: In a dark corner, playing Days again and writing site content Age: 23 Posts: 13,729
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Currently playing: Youkoso! Hitori Bouchi Level: 53 EXP: | I'd go with this, but. Quote:
However, you'd see nothing of the original Memory. For all purposes, it is a new Memory - as far as the "story" inside Sora's Memories is concerned, not as far as links in the chains are concerned. I kind of tend to think that description, while tying in with everything rather nicely, actually comes to contradict some events taking place in Days, and Xion though. Spoilers – Days… Hm. *goes to update that theory thread* Quote:
Quote:
Going with either the Days novels screwed up, or she was lying. Quote:
| ||||
![]() | |
| | #19 |
| MOAR. ® Join Date: May 2007 Location: ∵Иೆ!†तっФ」 Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() Level: 18 EXP: | As I've said in another topic, she "makes" memories based on pre-existing ones. Otherwise she would have no material to work with. So this does not contradict game canon. It's like the law of conservation of energy- Namine can neither destroy memories, nor can she create them out of nothing. She makes new ones out of old ones. |
| |
| | #20 |
| Araliya, Crimson & Gildragon's Xion Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: In a dark corner, playing Days again and writing site content Age: 23 Posts: 13,729
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Currently playing: Youkoso! Hitori Bouchi Level: 53 EXP: | Actually, it might very well contradict the canon yet. If by 'creating' new Memories the writer had her intending content wise, it's contradictory and silly. And even if they meant it by her being unable to create new links - we don't know the precise nature of Namine's powers. It might end up to be talking about the links in the chain in the novels, but in CoM she might've replaced the links, not the content, or something along those lines. The line can both contradict and not contradict the canon. However, we can't say for sure either which way at this point in time. |
![]() | |
| | #21 |
| MOAR. ® Join Date: May 2007 Location: ∵Иೆ!†तっФ」 Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() Level: 18 EXP: | Namine rearranges the links and creates new ones. Picture a chain. No chain, no way to make a different chain. With the chain, she takes out individual links and places them in new locations, which results in Sora remembering altered and/or entirely new memories. |
| |
| | #22 |
| -HAPPY FUN TIME- | |
| |
| | #23 |
| Araliya, Crimson & Gildragon's Xion Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: In a dark corner, playing Days again and writing site content Age: 23 Posts: 13,729
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Currently playing: Youkoso! Hitori Bouchi Level: 53 EXP: | See, it's the "rearrange" part that makes me doubt this. She can edit herself into the Memories as they are aligned already. Why bother changing the links? Why not just edit the whole thing as it stands? Sora cared about her enough when all she did was turn SRK -> SRKN. She could've left it like that. That was when she started tearing Memories out of the chain, which is something you didn't quite mention. It's not like at the end Sora had a life-time of Memories of Namine. He lacked a life-time of Memories, and only had Memories of hers left, as much as he had left of those. It just doesn't sound right in light of what we saw that she can only arrange them - again, especially with how little material she had to work with when we look at Repliku. Iono. When they describe someone with powers over Sora's Memories, I'd imagine that... ok, programmer lingo. I'd imagine that in Namine's Interface, we'd have Rearrange(), Shuffle(), Edit(), Detach(), and lo and behold - Create(). And it's not like she'd really have to work hard or something - we already saw that Sora's Heart reacted to her powers, by attaching feelings to the Memories she edited. Who's to say (well, the novels, but it's their canonity we're debating here) that Sora's Heart wouldn't have created a Link to fit once she started 'painting'? Hell, Namine urging Sora's Heart to create a link for her to work on might just be part of her powers. |
![]() | |
| | #24 | |
| MOAR. ® Join Date: May 2007 Location: ∵Иೆ!†तっФ」 Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() Level: 18 EXP: | Again, though, she cannot destroy memories. She herself said so. By "erase," she would just be altering the memories so that Sora could not remember them (whether this constitutes her yanking the entire chain out, breaking the links between them, and/or storing them away as "forgot, but not lost.") Quote:
By the time it's only SRN, Namine has effectively replaced Kairi. It was never about being a memory alongside Kairi, it was about overtaking those memories, ie rearranging them. Namine's interface? That's a certainly sketchy thing to base your reasoning on, but I'd like to point out that all f the processes (Rearrange, shuffle, edit, detach) are only possible if they're based in something that already exists. You're right, she does create memories in that regard, as I've already said. We're talking about "create" here not in the existential sense but in the... for lack of a better term, creative sense. Example: You make a sand castle. Because the sand as your medium already existed, does that not mean you created a sand castle? Of course not, you created a sand castle alright, just from something pre-existing (like the law of conservation of energy, you changed its structure). Similarly, Namine has to make memories from pre-existing ones, she cannot just insert ones that came out of nowhere. | |
| |
| | #25 |
| Araliya, Crimson & Gildragon's Xion Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: In a dark corner, playing Days again and writing site content Age: 23 Posts: 13,729
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Currently playing: Youkoso! Hitori Bouchi Level: 53 EXP: | It makes sense, never said otherwise. And the whole SoKai friendship -> SoNami romance -> SoKai romance that never really made it in KH2 is about the most logical way of putting it I came across ever. Would certainly also explain why Sora's Memories of Kairi's are so important and precious - because of the feelings attached to them from when they were Memories of Namine. (lol ironic twist on the whole damn thing) But something about it just still makes it icky, especially since we have no way of knowing if that was truly what they meant when Larxene said she was expecting Namine to create new Memories (just the content, or also the base? Could be both), and whether or not Namine was being truthful to Axel. Seemingly only two points, but depending on either answer, what you have there wouldn't be only a theory, it'll also be a false theory. Goldpanner said the Days' novels writer didn't have to do with CoM, did she? So she might not be up to date with all the tidbits. Also, we've no way of knowing whether or not that tidbit was brought up for Nomura's approval. And even if so, at this point, I wouldn't be surprised if he approved something in order to mislead us about the true canon, just to keep us from speculating in the right direction >_> |
![]() | |
| | #26 | |
| MOAR. ® Join Date: May 2007 Location: ∵Иೆ!†तっФ」 Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() Level: 18 EXP: | Quote:
7:05-8:05. Namine sums it up quite nicely. | |
| |
| | #27 | ||
| Araliya, Crimson & Gildragon's Xion Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: In a dark corner, playing Days again and writing site content Age: 23 Posts: 13,729
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Currently playing: Youkoso! Hitori Bouchi Level: 53 EXP: | "Many pieces are in a chain" Not all of them. See the Memories of Namine that sank into Sora's Heart and were out of reach. See Spoilers – Days… "Just take apart the links and rearrange them" Possible read just take apart the links, and rearrange them. Namely - two different options. Leading to what we see above since she never put them back in a chain that Sora had access to. You know what? Forget it. That movie actually made me believe there's no way she painted over. Take link, paint over. How in Nomura's name would Namine know what that Memory used to be? Do Memories have "restore" or "revert" options? I doubt, as opposed to Namine taking the links apart and letting Memories "sink". The false Memories would be linked to the Memories from Castle Oblivion, and that's why - despite those Memories being in Sora's present - would have to be delinked as well, otherwise they'll bring up a contradiction between the made up Memories and the original ones. Hence why Sora still remembered Namine despite her showing him a glimpse of Kairi on the DI Memory Floor - she didn't "peel off the pain", she pulled up a Memory of Kairi's Spoilers – Days… To speak your language - good luck putting every last grain of sand back in its place once you take apart the sand castle. It's possible in theory but you're going to need a map - which is something we lack in both cases. Oh, and also. 7:45 Quote:
8:08 Quote:
So yeah. I'm going with either contradiction here, or Namine was from bluffing to unaware herself. Since she was putting their Memories back together, not reverting them. Thanks, Grace. I needed that to get me on one side of the fence c: Last edited by Smile; November 10th, 2009 at 08:47 PM. | ||
![]() | |
| | #28 | |||
| MOAR. ® Join Date: May 2007 Location: ∵Иೆ!†तっФ」 Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() Level: 18 EXP: | Quote:
Quote:
Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia See: argument from personal incredulity "I find this so impossible and I have no idea how Namine could conceivably do such a thing." Quote:
I knew you would do that. She's using "make" there in the context I've been talking about the whole time, ie made from Sora's memories. There's no spin on grammar here. If you don't believe me, look up the original CoM ending and the Japanese Re:CoM ending. What does Namine say in place of that statement? That she has to undo the new links she made. New links make new memories out of old ones. | |||
| |
| | #29 | ||||
| Araliya, Crimson & Gildragon's Xion Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: In a dark corner, playing Days again and writing site content Age: 23 Posts: 13,729
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Currently playing: Youkoso! Hitori Bouchi Level: 53 EXP: | "I find this so impossible and I have no idea how Namine could conceivably do such a thing." I find this impossible as it was never truly hinted. Instead, Namine said, "take part false, put back true. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Chain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Quote:
You just quoted something which arguably, going by the same rules of grammar and logic you love so much - disproves you to a painful degree. She made new links. She created the basis as well as the content. | ||||
![]() | |
| | #30 | ||||
| MOAR. ® Join Date: May 2007 Location: ∵Иೆ!†तっФ」 Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() Level: 18 EXP: | Quote:
It was never hinted. It was stated by Namine in very obvious terms. She said, and I quote, Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Taking apart the links in a chain and rearranging them, you make NEW links based on preexisting pieces. By doing so, it gives Sora NEW memories based on OLD pieces with rearranged links. NEW, as I used it, doesn't have to be "out of nowhere." This isn't even hard to understand, it's not like they were vague in those lines. | ||||
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |