| | #16 |
| No. 4 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Urahara Store Age: 16
Posts: 3,085
Rep Power: 7 ![]() ![]() | I hope this doesn't give people the idea thats its okay to trash the planet. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Don't do that. Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: In the walls. Age: 15
Posts: 3,469
Rep Power: 11 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Screw this, we'll all be dead by the time our Earth 'splodes or whatever. |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Amino acids yeah Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,061
Rep Power: 13 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
We know F = mg, so we can write the equation as: mg = GMm/r^2 Where m = mass of a small object, G = Newton's constant, g = gravitational acceleration, r = mean radius and M = mass of Earth. That being said, if you divide both sides by m, you get the equation: g = GM/r^2 In essence, when finding the acceleration due to gravity on a planet's surface, the mass of the second object, which is our mass in this context, is negligible. Also, the acceleration of gravity is an important factor. Your mass will be constant where ever you go, however, the force of gravity acting on your body depends on the acceleration it has on your body, hence the reason why we have the equation F = mg, where the force of gravity is the product of mass and acceleration due to gravity. It's true that the acceleration due to gravity of the new planets doesn't have to be the same, but go maintain the same gravitational force that we have here on Earth, a radius of 1.733 is ideal. Last edited by Proline; 06/26/08 at 03:50 PM. | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Twilight♥ Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: New York City, smiling because he is waving over to me and I'm waving back.
Posts: 2,664
Rep Power: 11 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | If Earth does have a twin, it'd be weird and yet cool and at the same time......kinda shocking me. But I don't know. Sounds convincing as well but at the same time it's like 'Are they really sure?' If you know what I mean. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| *~Stickerbrush Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: In a cereal box
Posts: 1,814
Rep Power: 3 ![]() | The discovery seems pretty cool, but the idea of having to start over on another planet seems a little odd if it happens. All the construction and whatever to do would take a while as well as sending people over there would be bleh. Plus, Earth could probably be gone by the time we finally send people over there. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| lol sup? Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,821
Rep Power: 5 ![]() ![]() ![]() | Even if our bodys could stand the gravity, whats the point of going to another planet just because something isnt going right on our Earth. Screw our Earth up, go to another Earth, and then screw that one up, and so on, and so on. Still, the discovery is interesting. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Knight of Zero | Well, I can tell you that if I know the Earth is going to go kapoot, and there's a spaceship taking humans someplace else, I am going to be on that spaceship. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Twilight Knight | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Infinite Naughtfire | Earth isn't about to die. At least, not by natural causes. It's got a good 5 Billion years left before it's engulfed by the sun. That's of course considering we don't render it uninhabitable and/or blow it up That's all well and good, but it'll take us hundreds of years just to get there, regardless of where this planet happens to be. And when we do get there. If, by any chance, we go to this planet because we blew up Earth or made it uninhabitable, we still wouldn't learn anything. We'd just to the same thing if not quicker to this planet and then move onto another one. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Knight of Zero | Also, someone brought it up, I'd like to emphasize it. These things are millions of light years away, i.e. we're never getting to them. |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Ruler of Light Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Well... Go find me Age: 17
Posts: 513
Rep Power: 1 ![]() | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Amino acids yeah Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,061
Rep Power: 13 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Yes, that's true. The variable r represents the distance between two objects from their centres. In this case, we are using the mean radius since the second object is on the surface of the planet since the mean radius of Earth is from its centre to its surface, hence the reason why I made r the radius.. As I said before, the equation F = GMm/r^2 is the universal equation for gravity, however we also know that F = mg. Therefore, we can equate mg and GMm/r^2 for reasons obvious. To find g, we assume that the second mass, m, is located on the surface of the planet and we can divide both sides by m, giving us an equation for the acceleration due to gravity. You can test this for yourself by using the correct values to see if you get 9.81 m/s^2. |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Organization Member | If we get to these planet will the still be their? didn't somone say their millions of light years away? and if it is possible to make warp speed is that time travel or not? lol off topic. Any way new planets would be cool, just hope their no strange alines that would wont to eat us, and do we know if these planets have oxygen? |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Banned | depends, doesn't water, trees, and clouds suggest signs of Oxygen |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Organization Member | well then obviously their is oxygen, if the earth like planets r identifed but having trees and water. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |