Two new babe sigs

Trigger · May 28th, 2005, 02:07 AM

Im wearing both, The famous bouncy king of fighter mai shiranui, and the gambler tsunade from naruto, please comment

Mr.SpaceShipDriver · May 28th, 2005, 02:09 AM

i really really like mabe cause they have big melons big juicy melons

Kingdom2917 · May 28th, 2005, 02:12 AM

You might get in trouble for having the first sig cause her nipples are hard and they might consider that porn.

sealightbreeze · May 28th, 2005, 02:18 AM

Well, I for one, consider that thing porn. It is gross! little kids come onto the forums. ou might get yelled at for that. The background on the second sig is nice. But, that is about all. 0/10 for those images, and 6/10 for the bg on the second sig

Unknown Zinko · May 28th, 2005, 02:28 AM

good sigs trigger. i like there back grounds, the stocks are good and the text in the first are nice.

I dont know how you can consider them porn by todays standards there parts that would be censored out are cover. Art shouldnt have to be censored. Art doesnt need to be cencored. If some people are so concerned about these tags then a mod should put an age limit in the thread name.

Mr.SpaceShipDriver · May 28th, 2005, 02:29 AM

i dont know sealight i like it a lot

Trigger · May 28th, 2005, 03:01 AM

First off in the first one, the artists did the stock beautifuly and colred it well, I am learning on PS how to color in like that. That stock is around PG-13, she isnt showing anything at all people, people had sigs that show more.

Shinoda_EX · May 28th, 2005, 03:11 AM

LOL. Wow, not really suitable for a forum for 13 year olds but in terms of skill, they're rather good.
1: IE doesn't allow transparency for some reason...I don't really like the border. The BG doesn't really look like much except for a bunch of leaf brushes but overall, it looks rather nice. 8/10
2: The choice of colors is awkward, but it looks rather nice. 9/10

vampire_lord00 · May 28th, 2005, 03:30 AM

hmmm for some reason I really like them :)

darkweilder · May 28th, 2005, 09:31 AM

both the bg's and the stocks are beautiful the colors as well and the text is perfect.
10/10

*leonslionheart* · May 28th, 2005, 03:49 PM

Yeah, they aren't anywhere close to being considered porn. Seriously people, they could be showing a lot more. xP Well, being a girl myself, the pictures aren't that eye catching to me, lol >.< but i do like the bg's and the colors on them are very nice ^^ 8/10 for both

May 28th, 2005, 03:56 PM

in terms of the actual sig quality i think its very good uh there are few things i can think of thatlle make them a bit better but overall i give it nine out of ten

in terms of pornographicness it isnt trust me id know :D uh yeah i guess for the forum itd be on the edge between permittible and well not but overall its not

KingGabriel_VXI · June 1st, 2005, 04:53 PM

Those are great sigs, Trigger, nice blending, background, EXCEPT THE LADY'S BOOBS ARE ABOUT TO FALL OUT!!!!!!!! TRIGGER JUST GOT HORNY ALL OF A SUDDEN!... 11/10

Drama Setter · June 1st, 2005, 08:29 PM

come on guys...be mature bout this. the pics are tight nice bg and the text is good. 9.5/10

kairigirl · June 1st, 2005, 08:39 PM

They aren't that bad. Silh did say they were fine.

<--knows squat about graphics. Though as true as that may be, I do know a good one from a bad one. And the both of these are quite good. 10/10 for both.