| |
| View Poll Results: How should the Order Rankings deal with new members? | |||
| Expand to a higher number of ranks, encompassing more people? | | 11 | 29.73% |
| Have a single Open Challenge thread for people to challenge for the bottom rank? | | 15 | 40.54% |
| Do not allow new members until one drops away? | | 0 | 0% |
| Cycle the bottom five ranks periodically, to allow for newcomers? | | 11 | 29.73% |
| Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 | |
| Oblivion Angel Join Date: May 2005 Location: In Eternal Twilight Age: 18 Posts: 2,845
Rep Power: 7 ![]() Level: 14 EXP: | Quote:
Do so if you wish. I think that there should be an open challenge for one of the ranks though so people know that they are incapable of challenging. | |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Now In HD! Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Recalculating..... Posts: 1,673
Rep Power: 2 ![]() Level: 14 EXP: | So would that mean that a person not ranked would be able to remove someone else from the ranks? |
![]() | |
| | #33 |
| Oblivion Angel Join Date: May 2005 Location: In Eternal Twilight Age: 18 Posts: 2,845
Rep Power: 7 ![]() Level: 14 EXP: | |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Now In HD! Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Recalculating..... Posts: 1,673
Rep Power: 2 ![]() Level: 14 EXP: | I actually think it'd be more logical to have the ranks be able to expand beyond the 20 currently listed. But again, that's just my take on things. |
![]() | |
| | #35 |
| Rank 1 | Alright, I put a poll up. How do people think we should allow for new rankers? |
![]() | |
| | #36 |
| ⎳ΣGΣNDΛRΨ | |
| |
| | #37 | |
| She's Music to my Eyes Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Ohio Age: 17 Posts: 3,015
Rep Power: 9 ![]() ![]() Currently playing: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Level: 18 EXP: | Quote: I was just about to challenge you! | |
| | |
| | #38 |
| ⎳ΣGΣNDΛRΨ | Fukken lol. Then you judge my match, and I'll have to return the favour. Also, is it just me, or would people like to see a more material reward for battles than just a bit of fun and a pat on the back? I was thinking something like rep goes to the winner from the loser. |
| |
| | #39 |
| You there, i can see you naked Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: in a place Age: 18 Posts: 4,640
Rep Power: 9 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Currently playing: MAss Effect and Two Worlds. Level: 31 EXP: | I second that notion, the idea of expanding the ranks past 20 make it more interesting, and even more newcomers that could make things interesting. |
![]() | |
| | #40 |
| ⎳ΣGΣNDΛRΨ | To me, thirty sounds like it might be a bit much to take care of, twenty five sounds like a nice upper limit though. |
| |
| | #41 |
| Dual Wielder Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: En Jay. Age: 19 Posts: 571
Rep Power: 3 ![]() ![]() ![]() Level: EXP: | Expanding the ranks seems like a good idea, admitidly i was skeptical about rules for a non-rank to challenge one of the bottom half of the ranks from 16-20. (then again, isn't the purpose of being ranked means your always challenging, defending, and/or climbing the bracket?) Lastly 20 battle rp'ers out of the countless 50 or so that are active in the main section does kind of interval things in a way. |
![]() | |
| | #42 |
| Now In HD! Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Recalculating..... Posts: 1,673
Rep Power: 2 ![]() Level: 14 EXP: | And I'd dare to say that around twenty five would be the most the system would be getting at this point in time, were it to end up expanding beyond twenty. |
![]() | |
| | #43 |
| Oblivion Angel Join Date: May 2005 Location: In Eternal Twilight Age: 18 Posts: 2,845
Rep Power: 7 ![]() Level: 14 EXP: | "Not all battlers are role-players, and not all role-players are battlers" The problem with the first option is we lack the required numbers who frequent this section on a constant basis to expand the ranks further. The 3rd option should not even be considered. My bets are either on the 2nd or 4th choices. |
| | |
| | #44 | |
| Sidekick Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sitting in the rain, thinking up new ideas... Age: 21 Posts: 356
Rep Power: 2 ![]() Level: EXP: | Quote:
At any rate, I went for the second choice. There's no reason to really have past twenty, and even twenty itself seems a bit much to me. | |
![]() | |
| | #45 | |
| Oblivion Angel Join Date: May 2005 Location: In Eternal Twilight Age: 18 Posts: 2,845
Rep Power: 7 ![]() Level: 14 EXP: | Quote:
I'm well aware of that, but that's what I've observed. I don't frequent the main section much myself, and there are those who never came here from when I showed myself within this place up to 6 months ago. Of the 2nd and 4th choices, the 2nd choice is best. How long would it take before fresh blood wasn't so fresh? How often do we get new people in this section who actually stay? Last edited by KHFanatic4565; August 19th, 2009 at 08:06 AM. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| battle, challenge, i'm on a boat, order rank system, order ranks, role play, tournament |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |